воскресенье, 15 февраля 2009 г.

Сборка Firefox для Windows работает быстрее сборки для Linux

Недавно прочитал новость на opennet.ru о том что даже под Wine Firefox работает быстрее родного варианта. Решил проверить: всё таки у меня Firefox собран "своими руками" можно сказать, а под Windows сборка рассчитана на совместимость с i586.
В оригинале статьи использовались тесты SunSpider, V8 Benchmark 3 и Dromaeo. От использования V8 Benchmark 3 я отказался ввиду того, что раз от раза он выдаёт разные результаты, т.е. по хорошему если его использовать, то надо запускать его несколько раз и усреднять результаты, а я - человек ленивый....
Тестирование проводилось в условиях: одноядерный Athlon64 3000+, 1GB RAM, Gentoo x86_64 (kernel 2.6.28).
Ниже результаты тестов.
Dromaeo:
Тест Firefox/3.0.6 (Native) Firefox/3.0.6 (Wine)
Total Score: 22.15runs/s ±5.30% 28.24runs/s ±4.15%
▶ 3D Mesh Transformation 15.32runs/s ±11.28% 26.22runs/s ±40.89%
▶ 3D Raytrace 30.60runs/s ±22.65% 31.18runs/s ±13.33%
▶ AES Encryption/Decryption 14.01runs/s ±42.71% 13.12runs/s ±7.45%
▶ Arrays 57.80runs/s ±4.57% 64.22runs/s ±3.76%
▶ Base 64 Encoding and Decoding 22.07runs/s ±18.07% 21.11runs/s ±23.14%
▶ Bitwise And 55.75runs/s ±1.40% 45.64runs/s ±1.20%
▶ Code Evaluation 81.20runs/s ±33.84% 85.26runs/s ±30.02%
▶ Compute Bits in Byte 17.06runs/s ±1.16% 13.66runs/s ±1.24%
▶ Compute Bits in Byte (2) 21.84runs/s ±1.27% 15.80runs/s ±1.34%
▶ DNA Sequence Alignment 39.26runs/s ±17.93% 41.48runs/s ±9.06%
▶ DNA Sequence Counting 18.27runs/s ±2.63% 19.66runs/s ±2.35%
▶ DOM Attributes 28.12runs/s ±8.26% 37.57runs/s ±10.72%
▶ DOM Attributes (Prototype) 41.12runs/s ±8.19% 61.07runs/s ±5.24%
▶ DOM Attributes (jQuery) 36.02runs/s ±5.52% 46.58runs/s ±17.75%
▶ DOM Events (Prototype) 28.83runs/s ±32.56% 36.07runs/s ±14.34%
▶ DOM Events (jQuery) 21.43runs/s ±15.26% 26.56runs/s ±6.37%
▶ DOM Modification 10.11runs/s ±11.71% 46.05runs/s ±7.59%
▶ DOM Modification (Prototype) 11.08runs/s ±7.34% 15.06runs/s ±2.97%
▶ DOM Modification (jQuery) 19.58runs/s ±9.36% 37.27runs/s ±6.47%
▶ DOM Query 112.18runs/s ±1.07% 160.51runs/s ±2.25%
▶ DOM Style (Prototype) 30.43runs/s ±8.99% 43.00runs/s ±5.74%
▶ DOM Style (jQuery) 20.10runs/s ±20.31% 28.92runs/s ±9.31%
▶ DOM Traversal 6.32runs/s ±1.58% 9.30runs/s ±1.13%
▶ DOM Traversal (Prototype) 26.84runs/s ±8.38% 36.74runs/s ±6.26%
▶ DOM Traversal (jQuery) 12.17runs/s ±2.23% 16.79runs/s ±2.23%
▶ Date Formatting 54.91runs/s ±25.13% 72.39runs/s ±1.56%
▶ Date Formatting (2) 33.11runs/s ±39.51% 38.37runs/s ±34.54%
▶ DeltaBlue Constraint Solving 19.29runs/s ±1.40% 20.52runs/s ±1.34%
▶ Fannkuch 25.99runs/s ±0.94% 21.75runs/s ±1.13%
▶ MD5 Hashing 39.50runs/s ±30.34% 37.60runs/s ±1.03%
▶ N-Body Rotation and Gravity 12.98runs/s ±62.57% 19.06runs/s ±1.68%
▶ Partial Sum Calculation 23.55runs/s ±57.08% 47.93runs/s ±56.54%
▶ Prime Number Computation 12.77runs/s ±46.26% 12.40runs/s ±30.19%
▶ Prime Number Computation (2) 10.18runs/s ±32.18% 15.00runs/s ±4.04%
▶ RSA Encryption/Decryption 3.53runs/s ±16.88% 3.50runs/s ±0.98%
▶ RayTracer 0.94runs/s ±27.14% 1.55runs/s ±14.28%
▶ Recursive Number Calculation 49.20runs/s ±1.08% 38.64runs/s ±2.50%
▶ Regular Expressions 10.17runs/s ±1.32% 12.12runs/s ±1.41%
▶ Richards Benchmarks 36.57runs/s ±0.62% 34.82runs/s ±1.13%
▶ Rotating 3D Cube 32.17runs/s ±40.61% 30.39runs/s ±17.13%
▶ SHA1 Hashing 42.99runs/s ±2.53% 35.34runs/s ±2.07%
▶ Script Unpacking 5.13runs/s ±11.92% 5.48runs/s ±4.49%
▶ Spectral Norm of a Matrix 5.85runs/s ±180.44% 28.99runs/s ±2.84%
▶ String Parsing and Searching 1.41runs/s ±34.47% 2.41runs/s ±25.62%
▶ Strings 67.45runs/s ±6.29% 62.34runs/s ±3.89%
▶ Tag Cloud Creation 23.29runs/s ±13.53% 31.59runs/s ±18.38%
▶ Traversing Binary Trees 22.11runs/s ±1.84% 28.03runs/s ±15.72%
▶ Trigonometric Calculation 45.32runs/s ±1.37% 31.77runs/s ±1.69%
▶ Validate User Input 26.56runs/s ±34.56% 27.43runs/s ±44.77%
Total Score: 22.15runs/s ±5.30% 28.24runs/s ±4.15%

Первый тест подтвердил результаты из оригинальной статьи.
Идём дальше...
SunSpider:
Тест Сравнение Firefox/3.0.6 (Wine) Firefox/3.0.6 (Native)
ИТОГ 1.14x as fast 11327.2ms +/- 2.3% 9914.6ms +/- 1.4%
3d 1.23x as fast 1456.8ms +/- 16.7% 1182.4ms +/- 3.7%
access 1.25x as fast 1954.8ms +/- 2.3% 1569.6ms +/- 2.1%
bitops 1.32x as fast 1725.6ms +/- 2.4% 1304.8ms +/- 2.5%
controlflow 1.26x as fast 157.2ms +/- 0.7% 124.4ms +/- 0.9%
crypto 1.21x as fast 730.4ms +/- 2.7% 605.6ms +/- 3.7%
date 1.16x as slow 769.6ms +/- 5.6% 889.2ms +/- 6.4%
math 1.27x as fast 1352.8ms +/- 1.6% 1069.0ms +/- 3.7%
regexp 1.09x as slow 722.4ms +/- 3.9% 789.6ms +/- 9.5%
string - 2457.6ms +/- 12.1% 2380.0ms +/- 2.8%

А вот тут получили диаметрально противоложный результат. Так что, не всё так однозначно...

Комментариев нет:

Отправить комментарий